Meta ends fact-checking program: What it means for free speech and social media
In a surprising move, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced the company will eliminate its third-party fact-checking program in favor of a user-driven “Community Notes” model. The shift, framed as an effort to “restore free expression” and reduce censorship, is drawing sharp criticism from experts and advocates concerned about the spread of disinformation.
A “return to roots”
Speaking in a video announcement on Tuesday, Zuckerberg outlined the decision as part of a broader plan to simplify content policies, reduce mistakes, and rebuild trust. He emphasized that the previous system of fact-checking had “destroyed more trust than it created” and was perceived as “too politically biased.”
The new Community Notes system, similar to the one used on Elon Musk’s X (formerly Twitter), will rely on user contributions to provide context to posts. The feature will initially roll out in the U.S. over the coming months.
Political undertones
Meta’s decision comes amid a shift in U.S. political dynamics, with Republican President-elect Donald Trump set to take office. The move is seen by some as an attempt to repair Meta’s strained relationship with Trump and his supporters. Trump has previously accused Facebook of censoring conservative voices and labeled the platform an “enemy of the people.”
Meta’s plans include relocating its trust and safety teams from California to Texas—a gesture seen by critics as aligning the company more closely with Republican priorities. Zuckerberg has also pledged to work with Trump to counter international regulatory pressures on American tech companies.
A step back or forward?
Supporters of free speech argue that the decision prioritizes open dialogue and minimizes the risks of over-censorship. However, many experts warn that it could lead to the unchecked spread of harmful content, from conspiracy theories to hate speech.
“It’s going to hurt Meta’s users first,” says Angie Drobnic Holan, director of the International Fact-Checking Network. “The program worked well at reducing the virality of hoaxes and conspiracy theories. Most people don’t want to fact-check everything themselves.”
Imran Ahmed, CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate, described the move as a “huge step back” for online safety, warning of real-world consequences. “Meta is now saying it’s up to you to spot the lies on its platforms,” he said.
Nicole Sugerman, campaign manager at Kairos, raised concerns about how this shift might disproportionately affect marginalized communities, who are often the targets of disinformation campaigns.
Implications for social media
As Meta navigates this transition, the debate over free expression versus accountability will only intensify. The company’s new approach might appeal to advocates of minimal moderation, but the inherent risks of misinformation and offline implications cannot be ignored. Many will argue that the responsibility to discern fact from fake should not solely rest on individuals in this era of digital complexity.
